Free Self-Assessment

AI Governance Maturity Scorecard

11 dimensions. 5 minutes. A clear picture of where your organization stands on AI governance and where the gaps are.

Why This Matters

Most organizations are already using AI. Far fewer have governance structures to match. That gap creates real risk: inconsistent quality, undetected bias, accessibility failures, and decisions no one can trace or defend six months later.

This scorecard measures 11 specific dimensions of AI governance maturity, from non-negotiable boundaries and prompt engineering standards to bias detection, audit trails, and equity requirements. It is not a checklist of aspirations. It is a diagnostic of your current operational reality.

In 5 minutes, you will know:

  • Your overall governance maturity level across a five-tier framework
  • Which of the 11 dimensions are your strongest and which need immediate attention
  • Targeted insights on your highest-priority gaps with context for why they matter

Your results are immediate, specific to your responses, and yours to keep.

Get Your Free Scorecard

Enter your information below to access the full 11-dimension assessment. Your results will include a maturity level, a dimension-by-dimension breakdown, and targeted insights on your highest-priority gaps.

We tailor examples, tier narratives, and recommended next steps to the realities of your sector.

0 / 11

Rate your organization honestly on each dimension. There are no trick questions. The goal is an accurate picture, not a high score.

Each dimension uses a four-level scale: from no practice in place to fully operational and documented.

Non-Negotiable Boundaries

Has your organization defined explicit "red lines" for AI use that cannot be crossed regardless of efficiency gains or stakeholder pressure?

Rate your organization on Non-Negotiable Boundaries

Mission Alignment Verification

When someone proposes a new AI use case, is it evaluated against your organization's core mission, or does "it works" equal approval?

Rate your organization on Mission Alignment Verification

Risk-Tiered Classification

Not all AI outputs carry the same risk. A brainstorming draft and a client-facing decision require very different levels of scrutiny. Does your organization differentiate?

Rate your organization on Risk-Tiered Classification

Prompt Engineering Standards

The quality of AI output depends on the quality of the input. Does your organization have structured, reusable prompting practices, or is everyone improvising?

Rate your organization on Prompt Engineering Standards

Equity and Inclusion Requirements

Generic statements like "be inclusive" change nothing. Does your organization specify concrete, actionable inclusion requirements for AI-generated content?

Rate your organization on Equity and Inclusion Requirements

Domain-Grounded Quality Standards

AI doesn't know what "good" looks like in your field. Are your quality benchmarks derived from domain expertise and professional standards, or from AI defaults?

Rate your organization on Domain-Grounded Quality Standards

Bias Detection Protocols

AI systems reproduce the biases in their training data. Does your organization systematically check AI outputs for bias, or hope it's not a problem?

Rate your organization on Bias Detection Protocols

Human Review Workflow

AI outputs are drafts, not decisions. Does your organization have a defined review process that ensures qualified humans evaluate AI-generated work before it reaches stakeholders?

Rate your organization on Human Review Workflow

Adversarial and Counterfactual Testing

Does your organization test AI outputs for hidden bias by changing identity details and comparing results? For example, if you ask an AI to draft a performance summary and change only the person's name, gender, age, or location, does the tone, language, or content shift? These differences are often subtle but significant, and they compound when multiple identity factors intersect. Counterfactual testing like this is one of the most reliable ways to surface bias that a single output will never reveal.

Rate your organization on Adversarial and Counterfactual Testing

Transparency and Disclosure

Do the people affected by your AI-generated outputs know that AI was involved? Transparency builds trust. Obscuring AI involvement erodes it.

Rate your organization on Transparency and Disclosure

Audit Trail and Documentation

If a problem surfaces six months from now with something AI helped produce, can you trace what was generated, who reviewed it, and what decisions were made?

Rate your organization on Audit Trail and Documentation

Your AI Governance Maturity

0 / 33

Dimension-by-Dimension Breakdown

Your Highest-Priority Gaps

What This Means

Ready to Close the Gaps?

This scorecard shows you where you stand. A governance consultation shows you exactly how to move forward, tailored to your organization's context, risk profile, and capacity.

Book a Free Consultation
Governance Frameworks Workshops & Training Ongoing Advisory