Skip to main content
Get accessibility support
IAIS
  • Home
  • Calendar
  • Blog
  • IAIS Home
  • Contact
  • More
Site-wide search Close
Toggle search input
You are currently using guest access
Log in
IAIS
Home Calendar
Blog
IAIS Home
Contact
Expand all Collapse all
  1. Beowulf: Epic Poetry and the Human Experience
  2. Unit 1: Foundations — The Opening of Beowulf
  3. Activity 1.3.1: Can AI Analyze Literature?

Activity 1.3.1: Can AI Analyze Literature?

Completion requirements
Make a submission

Activity 1.3.1: Can AI Analyze Literature? Assignment

Learning Target: I can construct an evidence-based literary analysis that connects textual details to larger themes.

Estimated: 15-20 minutes

Before you write your own analysis, let's examine what happens when an AI tool tries to do it. Below is a paragraph generated by an AI chatbot in response to the prompt: "Write an analytical paragraph about the literary techniques in the opening of Beowulf."

[AI-Generated Sample]

The opening of Beowulf uses several literary techniques to create a powerful beginning. The poet uses alliteration, which is the repetition of consonant sounds at the beginning of words. For example, "Scyld Scefing" repeats the "sh" sound. The poet also uses kennings, which are compound expressions like "whale-road" for the sea. These techniques make the poem more interesting and show the poet's skill. Additionally, the poem has a sad tone when it describes the funeral ship. Overall, the opening of Beowulf is an excellent example of Anglo-Saxon poetry that demonstrates multiple literary devices working together to engage the reader.

Directions: Critically evaluate this paragraph. Consider:

  1. Accuracy: Are the factual claims correct? Does "Scyld Scefing" actually alliterate the way the AI claims? (Hint: check the original Old English pronunciation vs. the Gummere translation.)
  2. Depth: Does this paragraph analyze or merely identify? Using the summary vs. analysis distinction from the lesson, where does this paragraph fall?
  3. Evidence: Does it integrate specific quotations with line references? Does it meet the Claim-Evidence-Commentary standard?
  4. Cultural connection: Does it explain why these techniques matter to Anglo-Saxon culture, or does it stay at the surface level ("make the poem more interesting")?
  5. Voice: Does it sound like a student who wrestled with the text, or like a generic summary?

Your response (3-5 sentences): Write a brief evaluation identifying at least two specific strengths and two specific weaknesses of the AI-generated paragraph. Then explain what your own analysis will need to do differently to demonstrate genuine understanding.

Sentence Frames

One strength of the AI paragraph is _____, but a weakness is that it _____.
The AI correctly identifies _____, but it fails to explain _____ because _____.
My own analysis will need to go beyond this by _____, specifically by _____.

Why this matters: AI tools can produce text that looks like analysis but often stays at the identification and description level rather than reaching strategic thinking (analyzing why techniques create meaning in cultural context). Learning to spot the difference makes you a stronger reader, writer, and critical thinker.

Next: 01.01.03b - Activity: Model and Draft

Copyright © 2026, Inclusive AI Strategies LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Inclusive AI Strategies™ Course author Jon Fila.

◄ Lesson 1.3: Building Your Analysis
Activity 1.3.2: Model and Practice ►
Get the mobile app

Copyright © 2026, Inclusive AI Strategies LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Inclusive AI Strategies™

Copyright © 2026, Inclusive AI Strategies LLC. All Rights Reserved.
Inclusive AI Strategies™