Teacher-Only Resource (Hide from Students in LMS)
Total Points:
27 (9 MC × 1 point each = 9 points; 3 SA × 5 points each = 15 points)
Passing Score:
19/27 (70%)
Multiple Choice Questions (9 questions, 1 point each)
What distinguishes a "round" character from a "flat" character?
Correct Answer: A
They have complexity and contradiction
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development)
In the "Wound and Want" framework, what creates a character's deep want?
Correct Answer: B
The wound/formative experience
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3 (Write narratives with character development)
Which is the best example of "showing" rather than "telling" backstory?
Correct Answer: C
Every time thunder cracked, Maria's hand moved to the scar on her left arm and she went silent.
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3a (Establish narrative perspective), W.9-10.3d (Use precise words and phrases)
What is an archetype in storytelling?
Correct Answer: B
A recurring character pattern found across many traditions
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.6 (Analyze point of view and archetype), RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development)
When a writer "subverts" an archetype, they are:
Correct Answer: B
Deliberately breaking or reversing the expected pattern
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), RL.9-10.6 (Analyze point of view and archetype)
What is the relationship between a character's "surface goal" and "deep goal"?
Correct Answer: B
The surface goal drives the plot while the deep goal drives the character
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3 (Write narratives with character development)
Why are character flaws important in fiction?
Correct Answer: B
They create internal conflict that drives growth and story
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3 (Write narratives with conflict and development)
What are the essential building blocks of a compelling character?
Correct Answer: B
Backstory, motivation, personality traits, flaws, and goals
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3 (Write narratives with character development)
What makes a character's motivation compelling?
Correct Answer: B
When it connects to relatable human desires like love, belonging, justice, or survival
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3 (Write narratives with character development)
Short Answer Questions (3 questions, 5 points each)
Choose a character from a book, show, film, or game. Identify their primary archetype and explain whether the author plays it straight or subverts it. Use at least one specific example from the text.
Exemplar Response:
Luke Skywalker from "Star Wars" fits the classic Hero archetype—the young, ordinary person who discovers their special power and must save the world. However, George Lucas subverts this archetype by making Luke initially reluctant and uncertain, refusing the call to adventure at first when he worries about his farm. In the original trilogy, Lucas further subverts the archetype by having Luke's ultimate victory come not through violent conquest but through redemption and mercy: he defeats the Empire by turning his father back to the light, not by destroying him. This complexity—where the hero wins by choosing love over power—goes against the traditional Hero archetype of achieving victory through strength and combat. This subversion makes Luke more interesting and human than a straight archetypal hero would be.
Scoring Guidance (5 points):
-
5 points:
Identifies archetype clearly, explains whether it's played straight or subverted, provides 2+ specific examples with textual evidence, and reflects deeper understanding of how subversion affects characterization.
-
4 points:
Identifies archetype, explains straight/subversion, provides at least 1-2 specific examples, shows good understanding of the concept.
-
3 points:
Identifies archetype and attempts to explain straight/subversion, but examples are vague or limited; some understanding is present.
-
2 points:
Identifies an archetype but doesn't clearly explain straight vs. subversion, or examples don't support the analysis.
-
1 point:
Minimal response; archetype is named but analysis is absent or incorrect.
-
0 points:
No response or completely off-topic.
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), RL.9-10.6 (Analyze point of view and archetype), RL.9-10.1 (Cite textual evidence)
Explain the "Wound and Want" framework. Then, using a character you know (from fiction or your own creation), identify their wound and want and explain how the wound creates the want.
Exemplar Response:
The "Wound and Want" framework says that characters are often driven by a deep emotional wound—a painful formative experience—that creates their deepest want or goal. The wound is what happened to them; the want is how they're trying to heal, whether they know it or not. For example, in "The Hunger Games," Katniss Everdeen's wound is losing her father in the mines and nearly starving as a result. This wound creates her deep want: to protect those she loves and to survive at any cost. Everything Katniss does—volunteering for the Games, forming alliances, fighting the Capitol—stems from this wound. She wants to be the protector and provider that her father no longer can be, and she wants to ensure her sister and mother never experience the poverty and loss she did. Without the wound of her father's death and her family's poverty, Katniss would be a very different character with different motivations. The wound explains why she acts the way she does.
Scoring Guidance (5 points):
-
5 points:
Explains framework clearly and accurately, identifies wound and want with clear connection between them, provides specific character example with explanation of how wound drives want.
-
4 points:
Explains framework well, identifies wound and want, shows clear understanding of their connection, uses character example effectively.
-
3 points:
Explains framework adequately, identifies wound and want, but connection is somewhat unclear or character example is underdeveloped.
-
2 points:
Framework explanation is incomplete or vague; wound and want are identified but their connection is weak.
-
1 point:
Minimal explanation of framework; wound or want is missing or unclear.
-
0 points:
No response or completely off-topic.
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development), W.9-10.3 (Write narratives with character development), W.9-10.3d (Use precise words and phrases)
Compare how two different cultural storytelling traditions approach character flaws or character growth differently. What does each approach reveal about what that culture values?
Exemplar Response:
In Western storytelling traditions (such as contemporary American cinema), character flaws are often seen as things to overcome—the hero has a flaw that holds them back, and growth means correcting or conquering that flaw. For example, in many superhero films, the protagonist must overcome their selfishness or fear to become the hero society needs. This reflects a Western cultural value on individual transformation and self-improvement through willpower. In contrast, many Japanese storytelling traditions, influenced by Buddhist and Zen philosophy, view flaws differently. Characters are expected to accept and live with their limitations rather than overcome them completely. Anime characters often show growth not by eliminating their flaws but by learning to work with them or finding peace with them. This reflects Japanese cultural values of acceptance, balance, and harmony rather than conquest. Both approaches make sense for their cultures: Western culture emphasizes individual agency and change, while Japanese culture emphasizes acceptance and balance within larger systems.
Scoring Guidance (5 points):
-
5 points:
Identifies two distinct cultural traditions, explains their different approaches to character flaws/growth, connects approach to cultural values, provides supporting examples.
-
4 points:
Identifies two traditions with different approaches, explains connection to cultural values, examples are generally supportive.
-
3 points:
Identifies two traditions and notes differences, but connection to cultural values is somewhat underdeveloped.
-
2 points:
Attempts to compare two traditions but comparison is superficial or cultural connection is unclear.
-
1 point:
Mentions two traditions but doesn't develop comparison or cultural connection.
-
0 points:
No response or completely off-topic.
Standards Addressed:
RL.9-10.3 (Analyze character development across texts), RL.9-10.6 (Analyze point of view and how author develops it), RL.9-10.1 (Cite textual evidence)
Quick Answer Reference
Quick reference of all quiz questions, answer types, correct answers, and point values
|
Q#
|
Type
|
Answer
|
Points
|
|
1
|
MC
|
A
|
1
|
|
2
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
3
|
MC
|
C
|
1
|
|
4
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
5
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
6
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
7
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
8
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
9
|
MC
|
B
|
1
|
|
10
|
SA
|
See exemplar
|
5
|
|
11
|
SA
|
See exemplar
|
5
|
|
12
|
SA
|
See exemplar
|
5
|
|
TOTAL
|
27
|